*基于内部测试
Integrates with
Security & Compliance
您是否正在忽视 AI 代码审查工具?
您不是一个人。以下是开发者对传统 AI 审查工具的看法:
噪音太多
"每个 PR 18 条评论。我可能只看 2 条。大多数只是我不关心的代码风格问题。"
— 中级开发者,50 人创业公司
遗漏真正问题
"它建议把 `e` 重命名为 `error`,却完全漏掉 SQL 注入漏洞。每次都是这样。"
— 高级工程师,金融科技公司
零上下文
"建议我们采用 3 个月前已经否决的重构模式。完全不记得我们的决策。"
— 技术负责人,B 轮公司
问题不在于 AI。
问题在于 单智能体 AI.
猜测 vs 调查
看看 diffray 如何处理真实场景:PR 中的函数签名变更
AI 响应:
"这改变了返回类型。确保调用方已更新。"
智能体调查:
1. 搜索了 getUserData()
2. 发现 3 个调用点 存在类型不匹配
3. 检查测试覆盖—— 2 个测试需要更新
4. 影响: api/users.ts:47, hooks/useUser.ts:23
区别在于? 调查,而非猜测。
如何开始
看看设置 diffray 并获得首次多智能体代码审查有多简单

使用 GitHub 登录
一键连接 GitHub 账户。无需复杂设置——只需授权即可开始。

安装 GitHub App
将 diffray 添加到您的组织或个人仓库。选择要启用的仓库——完全由您控制。

配置您的仓库
自定义审查设置,启用特定智能体,设置团队编码规范。

获取智能审查
打开 Pull Request,见证奇迹发生。几分钟内收到聚焦、可操作的反馈。
Real Issues. Real PRs.
Not mock examples — actual findings from production code reviews

Understands Your Project Context
Detected moment-timezone being added when the project already uses dayjs. A linter can't catch this — it requires understanding the existing codebase.

Finds Concurrency Issues
Concurrent requests can read stale data and overwrite each other. Suggests Prisma transactions with optimistic locking.

Finds Duplicate Utilities
New formatMoney function duplicates existing formatPrice utility. Suggests reusing what's already there.

Prevents Type Drift
CalPromotionData type defined in both API and component files. Risking type drift as code evolves.
Real findings from cal.com open-source code reviews
diffray 多智能体系统工作原理
多个专业阶段协同工作,找到真正重要的问题
PR Event
Analysis
Specialized Agents
Dedup
Review
PR Event
Context Analysis
Specialized Agents
Deduplication
Final Review
How diffray compares
See why teams switch to multi-agent AI
| Feature | diffray | CodeRabbit | GitHub Copilot | SonarQube |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing | $9/dev/mo | $15/dev/mo | $19/user/mo | $150+/year |
| Multi-Agent AI | ||||
| False Positive Rate | 87% fewer | High | High | Very High |
| Developer Action Rate | 98% | ~20% | ~15% | ~15% |
| Full Codebase Awareness | ||||
| Custom Rules | ||||
| Zero Duplicate Comments | ||||
| Free for Open Source | Limited | Community |
切换到 diffray 的团队
"我们将每周 PR 审查时间从 45 分钟减少到 12 分钟。团队现在真正信任 AI 反馈了。"
— 工程经理,35 人 SaaS 创业公司
"CodeRabbit 每个 PR 给我们 20+ 条评论。我们忽略了大部分。diffray 给我们 3-4 条,总是精准的。"
— 技术负责人,B 轮金融科技公司
"代码库感知分析是颠覆性的。它发现了一个重复实现,本来会浪费我们 2 天时间。"
— CTO,AI 创业公司(20 名工程师)
Simple, transparent pricing
Pay per developer. Unlimited reviews.
Solo
1 developer
Team
3-10 devs
Growth
11-25 devs
Scale
26-50 devs
Enterprise
50+ devs
Built on Proven Research
Our multi-agent approach is grounded in peer-reviewed research from leading institutions
"Multi-agent systems can boost visibility by up to 40% in generative engine responses through coordinated intelligence and cross-validation."
"By 2026, traditional search engine volume will decrease by 25% as AI-powered answers increasingly become the primary way users interact with information."
"Code review is the single most effective technique for finding defects, with an average effectiveness of 60% compared to 25% for unit testing alone."
Fewer false positives with multi-agent review
vs. single-agent tools
More real bugs detected
cross-validation effect
Developer action rate
vs. 15-20% industry avg
Review completion time
parallel agent processing



