Comparison

diffray vs Cursor

Cursor est un IDE alimente par IA qui excelle dans la generation de code et l'edition multi-fichiers. diffray est une plateforme de revue de code PR avec des agents specialises. Ils servent des objectifs differents et fonctionnent bien ensemble.

87%

Fewer False Positives

vs single-agent tools

3x

More Bugs Detected

with multi-agent review

98%

Developer Action Rate

on diffray comments

The Code Review Problem

15-20%

Industry avg action rate on AI comments

2-4 hrs

Wasted per week on false positives

60%

Of AI reviews are ignored by devs

$150K+

Annual cost of review inefficiency

Feature Comparison

See how diffray and Cursor compare across key features

Feature
diffray
Cursor

Multi-Agent Architecture

Multiple specialized AI agents working together

Pull Request Review

Automated review on every PR

IDE Integration

Real-time feedback in code editor

Self-Hosted Option

On-premise deployment available

Security Scanning

Vulnerability and secrets detection

Custom Rules

Define your own review rules

Language Support

Number of programming languages

All major
50+

CI/CD Integration

Integrates with CI/CD pipelines

Key Differentiator

Multi-Agent vs Single-Agent Architecture

Cursor uses a single AI model that tries to do everything. This leads to context dilution, hallucinations, and 60-80% false positive rates that waste developer time.

diffray deploys 11 specialized agents that work together: Security Agent, Performance Agent, Architecture Agent, and more. Each agent is expert in its domain and cross-validates findings — reducing review noise by 87%.

Security Agent

OWASP, secrets, auth

Performance Agent

N+1, memory, speed

Architecture Agent

Patterns, coupling

Quality Agent

Bugs, edge cases

Cursor (Single-Agent)

  • Not a code review tool
  • No PR integration
  • IDE-only
  • No security scanning

diffray (Multi-Agent)

  • 87% fewer false positives — specialized agents reduce noise
  • 3x more real bugs caught with cross-validation
  • 98% action rate (vs 15-20% industry average)
  • < 5 min review time per PR
  • 80% time saved on code review

Pricing Comparison

See how much you can save with diffray

Plan
diffray
Cursor

Open Source

Public repos

Free Forever
Hobby tier available

Team (3-10 devs)

Most popular

$9/dev/mo$7/dev annually
$20/month

Enterprise

50+ developers

Contact Us
$40/user/month

Switch to diffray and save

Teams of 5 devs save up to $300+/year vs Cursor

The Verdict

Utilisez diffray pour la revue de code PR automatisee. Utilisez Cursor pour l'ecriture de code assistee par IA. De nombreuses equipes utilisent les deux.

Choose diffray if:

Equipes voulant une revue automatisee sur chaque pull request

Choose Cursor if:

Developpeurs voulant la generation de code IA dans l'IDE

Why teams switch to diffray:

Outils differents pour differentes etapes : Cursor ecrit, diffray revoit

Other Comparisons

Learn More About diffray

Discover why diffray stands out from Cursor

Comprehensive Guide

10 Best AI Code Review Tools in 2026

Compare all tools including Cursor in our detailed guide.

Ready to Try diffray?

See why teams switch from Cursor to diffray. Start with a 14-day free trial, no credit card required.

Free for open source
14-day free trial
No credit card required